Governance gone wrong: examining self-regulation of the legal profession

England and Australia have abandoned self-regulation of the legal profession yet Canadian law societies continue to function on this basis. This article argues that the self-regulatory model on which the Law Society of Ontario (the “LSO”) operates represents an inadequate form of governance in terms of the accountability it yields. When compared to other organizations, including law societies…

A Legal Framework for Robo-Advisors

The aim of this paper is to offer a broad framework to allow a better understanding of the current legal situation of Robo-Advisory. The disruption of robo-advisors as new market players in the financial sector are bringing new challenges that the regulators must face in the short term. For this reason, at this time, it…

The proposed Australian consumer data right: a European comparison

This article examines the new Australian consumer Comprehensive right to access and use data, also known as the Consumer Data Right, recently proposed by the Australian Productivity Commission, and adopts a comparative analysis with data protection, competition and consumer developments in the European Union (EU). Firstly, a brief overview is given of the legal context…

Regulating Law Firms from the Inside: The Role of Compliance Officers for Legal Practice in England and Wales

Following the Legal Services Act 2007, which permitted the delivery of legal services through Alternative Business Structures (ABS), the Solicitors Regulation Authority required all regulated legal service firms to appoint Compliance Officers for Legal Practice (COLPs). COLPs are charged with taking reasonable steps to ensure that firms comply with their obligations, which entails interpreting what outcomes‐focused regulation(OFR) requires…

Finding ways to quicken, not deaden, the spirit of legal education: reflections on approaches to drafting regulatory standards

Legal education is entering a period of great uncertainty. On the one hand the burgeoning quantity of law and legislation, the disruptive influences of technology and the reality of falling student wellbeing demand a re-examination of the content and approach to legal education. On the other hand, regulators and admitting authorities are increasingly concerned with…

Control over Blockchain Network

One of the key problems of blockchain technology is lack of control of users, organized societies, and state authorities over the transactions and asset on the decentralized network. The distributed ledger and blockchain are interesting as an example of new technology, which is the rule not only for users but also for governments. Technology-driven rules…

Lawyers’ ethical obligations, innovative models of legal service and a time of regulatory upheaval: settlement counsel as an instructive model

Current models of professional regulation still embody traditional norms around the lawyer’s role. This article explores the constraints of reactive, rule-based ethical frameworks, using the example of Settlement Counsel, an innovative negotiation structure to advance settlement in commercial litigation. Settlement counsel work alongside litigation counsel, on the same side of the litigation file, but with carefully bifurcated roles….

Two’s Company, Three’s a Crowd? Regulating Third-Party Litigation Funding, Claimant Protection in the Tripartite Contract, and the Lens of Theory

The advent of third-party litigation funding (‘TPLF’) is arguably one of the most significant developments in civil litigation in common law countries for many decades. While third party-funded and indemnified defendants have appeared in common law courts for some centuries, the recent corresponding appearance of third party-funded and indemnified plaintiffs is in many ways a…

How to Build a Better Bar Exam

As a licensing exam, the purpose of the bar exam is consumer protection–-ensuring that new lawyers have the minimum competencies required to practice law effectively. As critics point out, however, the exam, and particularly the multiple-choice question portion of the exam, has significant flaws because it assesses legalknowledge and analysis in an artificial and unrealistic context,…

Brought to you by ICLR.